Comments on: Missed By a Hair

By: Webmaster

Webmaster — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:07:22 +0000

Hello! Please e-mail me your contacts. I have a question webmaster@bravto.ru” rel=”nofollow”>……

Thank you!!!…

By: Kylie Batt

Kylie Batt — Mon, 03 May 2010 22:13:05 +0000

Весьма ценная информация…

художник-стилист, дизайнер
Of course if talking about Phil Spector’s hair a miss is as good as a mile…..

By: Frankie Bones

Frankie Bones — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:43:25 +0000

Thanks for putting your all into it. You are a trooper.

By: Mary

Mary — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:10:48 +0000

Hi Michel and TLE crew! Of course, I am disappointed that Spector cannot be the next trial on TLE. BUT, I am holding steadfast and will continue to visit and support TLE. Your coverage and accompanying videos of the Oj trial were super! The exclusive with OJ was awesome! You guys are appreciated by all and I look forward to the “next” trial!

Minnesota

By: SeniorMoments

SeniorMoments — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:28:26 +0000

Yes, Michel, thanks for trying. I am confused however, that you say that you have no new trials coming up. Doesn’t that leave a gap that could have been filled with SpectorII since it would not be taking the place of the multiple trials that you mentioned wanting to do rather than focus on a long term single trial? Is it because you need to “piggyback” with another source for pool coverage? I admit I’m not at all familiar with the technicalities that would be required, if that is the reason. My curiosity requires me to ask who among newspaper editors and television producers makes the decision on what trials to cover and what criteria is used to make that decision? Who determined that there would not be enough interst in Spector II and what did they base it on? We trial watchers gather like moths to a flame and will no doubt watch whatever is served to us, but in this case, there was clearly a preference expressed. Only you listened.

You also alluded to the Halverson trial in Las Vegas in an earlier message. I think that the hearing attracted a large audience and the trial for this bizarre case would surely do so as well. When is it scheduled and will you be covering that one?

By: tartangirl

tartangirl — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:16:48 +0000

Thank You MJB,

Yes, we are let down but nothing can keep my spirits bottled up for long. I still have to keep the faith. After all we are getting PS back in the courtroom again and as Justice for Lana will be carried out, my hope for some kind of media attention to this trial will rise to the top also.

You have been a real friend to the dedicated trial addict and we will not forget your kind and considerate attitude to include us again in the real life
drama of PS2

By: C.J.

C.J. — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:34:04 +0000

Thank you for trying! Just being listened to is a novelty for trial watchers, we don’t usually register at all. You went out of your way to help and I am grateful.

By: pb

pb — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:36:00 +0000

Thanks for giving it a try, Michel — but since it’s a ‘no’ let’s just move on and get hooked up with
another doable live trial.

By: Robert Freck

Robert Freck — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:30:07 +0000

The fact that you cannot find a decent trial for the rest of the year makes it even more of a puzzle that Legal Edge…ALL THINGS LEGAL…..won’t cover it just because it is the best available at this time.

By: katfish

katfish — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:50:05 +0000

Thanks for trying to make this happen. I have a question concerning a statement in your blog. “I believe there is still hope for Openings, Closings and Verdict to be televised but there has been no official word on that yet.”
Are you referring to KTLA? If so, didn’t the Judge Fidler say in court that he has approved their application for TV coverage? Honestly, I don’t expect to see them changing their line-up to cover this trial but assume they will provide limited coverage online. I have tried to help spread the word via my blog and expect someone may ask what you were referring to.
Sincerely,
A Fan